Academic research from Professor Ian Marsh and Norman Niemer of Cass Business School, London, finds no strong evidence that the emergency short selling restrictions imposed in various mPARA_BREAK_SENTINEL_9f8e7d6c Academic research from Professor Ian Marsh and Norman Niemer of Cass Business School, London, finds no strong evidence that the emergency short selling restrictions imposed in various markets around the world have changed the behaviour of stock returns. The International Securities Lending Association, the Alternative Investment Management Association and the London Investment Banking Association jointly commissioned the research to contribute to the wider regulatory reviews ongoing by various national and international regulatory bodies. The researchers examined daily returns on UK, US, Italian, French and German shares before and after the introduction of restrictions on short selling, including shares which are subject to the restrictions, and those which are not. The research found no strong evidence that restrictions on short selling changed the behaviour of stock returns. Stocks subject to the restrictions behaved very similarly both to how they behaved before their imposition and to how stocks not subject to the restrictions behaved. Comparing behaviour across countries where the nature of the restrictions differed, the authors found no systematic patterns consistent with the expected effect of the new regulations. For example, there was no evidence of a reduced probability of large price falls. The authors also found no sign of any detrimental impact of the constraints in terms of reduced efficiency of pricing. Regression analysis suggested that changes in stock returns were driven mainly by other factors affecting the financial sector as a whole rather than the restrictions on short selling. Some systematic changes in the behaviour of financial sector stocks could be discerned, but no strong evidence of a systematic impact of the restrictions could be identified. The report refers to one caveat which relates to the shortness of the post-restrictions period in most countries, which does not appear to the authors to change the robustness of their findings. In a joint statement, the associations request that this research be considered carefully. They continue to offer their full support to all efforts in identifying appropriate and reasonable measures for the longer-term security and stability of the financial system. On the basis of this research, the associations see no case for continued bans on short selling as there is no strong evidence that these have been effective in reducing share price volatility or limiting share price falls.
Exploiting the volatility premium through systematic strategies
With over $2bn in AUM just two years after launch, Empureon is leveraging volatility premiums, portfolio hedging and portable alpha to…
More
Alternative Views Ahmet Peker and Daniel Lucke
In Alternative Views Hedgeweek®,goes behind closed doors with those in the know to get the latest on hedge funds. Today, we speak to Ahmet…
More
Removing human bias from an concentrated market
Mast Investments outline how systematic investment processes seek to reduce behavioural biases while identifying opportunities created by…
More